Competing Over Preempts

by Jon Gustafson

These notes discuss direct actions only. Balancing bids require less strength while partner's expected strength increases. Also, in general, don't preempt over a preempt, but greater liberties can be taken when partner is a passed hand.


Over a Four-Level Opening Preempt1

In Bridge World Standard,

How do you judge when to act? We must recognize sufficient strength indicated by both, not too many quick losers and the prospect of developing enough winners. Experience is key, so consider the following hands.

Matchpoints, neither side vulnerable, the bidding has gone:

South West
North East
--- --- --- 4S
?

  1. S7 HK875 DA532 CA1064
Pass. Perfect shape, but not strong enough. If north has enough to make a game opposite this hand he will be on his way to six.
  1. S7 HAQ87 DKQ108 CAJ106
Double. This hand has perfect shape and good strength. If no contract makes you will have lots of company. A fit is likely and north's expected strength puts you in the game zone.
  1. S7 HAKQ8 DKQ108 CAK62
Double. The shape, not the strength, dictates the takeout double. You will be very unlucky to go negative unless you take a stab at an unmakeable slam.
  1. SK87 HAQ2 DAJ104 CK83
Pass. Doubling with this type of hand is no longer considered standard expert practice. If you double with both this hand and hand 3), north's decisions will be much too difficult. Pass and go plus.
  1. SK87 HAQ2 DAKJ4 CAQ6
Double. Finding the par spot will be difficult for everyone. If north has a relatively flat hand with which his best tactic is to pass, all should be fine. Otherwise bidding more requires guesswork.
  1. S --- HQJ765 DA3 CKJ9743
Four Notrump. Shows a non-specific two-suiter. North will start by choosing between the minors, giving preference to clubs. If partner bids diamonds, you will correct to hearts, showing hearts and clubs. This hand is marginally strong enough to compete at this level, but with a void and 6-5 shape, pass would be difficult.

Over a Weak Two-Bid2

Traditional expert methods include,

Matchpoints, neither side vulnerable, the bidding has gone:

South West
North East
--- --- --- 2H
?


  1. SA87 H --- DKJ87532 CAK3
Three Diamonds. Start by bidding your suit. After the expected heart raise, double for take-out showing a good suit with support for the other two suits.
  1. SA87 H --- DAK3 CKQJ10753
Double. First double to show the huge playing strength. You are not afraid of further competition. After two spades (0-7) jump to four clubs. After three diamonds (8-11) bid four clubs which is forcing. After two notrump (lebensohl, requesting three clubs) jump to four clubs, not forcing.
  1. SAQJ52 H --- DK3 CAQ8762
Four Clubs. Shows spades and clubs, at least 5-5 and a strong hand (forcing). This hand is close.
  1. SA87 H65 DAKQ10865 CJ
Three Hearts. Asking for a heart stopper. Would prefer to have K or Qx of clubs.
  1. SAKQ52 H --- DK3 CAKJ762
Four Clubs. Show slam interest by bidding five clubs over north's attempt to signoff in four spades.
  1. SK87 HAQ5 DAKQ3 CKQ2
Double. Plan to raise north's expected lebensohl two notrump bid to three. With such a lack of tricks you might bid only two notrump over two spades. If north shows constructive values with a three-level new suit bid, investigate slam.

After a Four-of-a-Major Preempt in Competition3

After partner has doubled or bid a suit, a response of 4NT is for takeout (for the unbid suits) only if an opponent has bid 4H or 4S, you have not previously acted, partner has not made a weak bid, nor overcalled a weak enemy bid, and there are at least two unbid suits among clubs, diamonds and hearts.  Otherwise a 4NT response is ace asking.

(1H) - 1S - (4H) - 4NT (minors)

(P) - 1D - (4S) - 4NT (clubs+hearts)

(1H) -  double - (4H) - 4NT (minors)

(2H) - 2S - (4H) - 4NT (RKB)

(4S) -  double  -  (P)  -  4NT (3-suit takeout)

(1H) - 2S - (4H) - 4NT (RKB, 2S = weak)

(P) - 1D - (4H) - 4NT (RKB)

(1D) -  double - (4H) - 4NT (Blackwood)


The example hands and discussion for each of the above sections was extracted from the following articles. See the originals for a more thorough discussion.

1 Beverly Kraft, Improve Your Bidding, The Bridge World, November 2004, pp 66, 74.
2 Beverly Kraft, Improve Your Bidding, The Bridge World, December 2004, pp 70, 74.
3 Richard Pavlicek, Pavlicek System, February 5, 2004, p 78.